{"id":103666,"date":"2022-08-14T16:47:32","date_gmt":"2022-08-14T16:47:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wordpress.gurbuz.net\/?p=103666"},"modified":"2022-08-14T18:04:14","modified_gmt":"2022-08-14T18:04:14","slug":"wer-bin-ich-dass-ich-euch-euere-religion-erklaeren-muesste-koennte-ich-das-ueberhaupt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/wordpress.gurbuz.net\/?p=103666","title":{"rendered":"Wer bin ich, dass ich euch euere Religion erkl\u00e4ren m\u00fcsste, d\u00fcrfte? K\u00f6nnte ich das \u00fcberhaupt?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Cogito, ergo sum<\/strong>
\n\"\"<\/p>\n

Im t\u00fcrkischen…
\nHabe ich es den T\u00fcrken „erkl\u00e4rt“<\/p>\n

„41 Tote bei Brand in einer koptischen Kirche<\/strong> in \u00c4gypten“<\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.focus.de\/panorama\/welt\/41-tote-bei-brand-in-einer-koptischen-kirche-in-kairo_id_135645110.html<\/p>\n

Evangelium des Judas(!)<\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.bibelwissenschaft.de\/wibilex\/das-bibellexikon\/lexikon\/sachwort\/anzeigen\/details\/evangelium-des-judas\/ch\/3b091986301e388a80103289224fc73c\/<\/p>\n

„Das“ PDF<\/p>\n

„Judas Evangelium“ auf deutsch<\/a><\/p>\n

Ich h\u00e4tte DAS nicht ver\u00f6ffentlicht WENN es nicht wirklich wichtig w\u00e4re…
\nKommt die Zeit…
\nWERDET ihr verstehen.<\/p>\n

Die…
\nVerst\u00e4ndnis Psychologie…
\nEin interessantes Feld. Auch Wahrnehmungspsychologie* genannt…<\/p>\n

\u00dcZ\u00dcM\u00dcN\u00dc YE ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sorma<\/p>\n

Frag nicht wer oder was ich bin…
\n„ein Gentleman genie\u00dft und schweigt“<\/p>\n

* Der Parallax-Effekt oder auch Parallaxeneffekt genannt, basiert auf der Bewegungsparallaxe. Dabei handelt es sich um ein Ph\u00e4nomen der Wahrnehmungspsychologie. Sie beschreibt die optische T\u00e4uschung, dass sich ein Objekt zu bewegen scheint, wenn der Beobachter seinen Blickwinkel \u00e4ndert.<\/p>\n

Der Parallaxeneffekt…
\nIch WERDE darauf zur\u00fcckkommen. Glaube nicht immer was du meinst zu sehen…
\nOder zu verstehen…
\nWie hei\u00dft es doch so sch\u00f6n?
\nNur BARES ist WARES…
\nFakten…
\nSind es was z\u00e4hlt. Zusammenh\u00e4nge zu erkennen…
\nNa ja, daf\u00fcr sind Typen wie ich da!<\/p>\n

Ich WERDE niemals die drei Schwestern des Ordens vergessen, den Russen mit seinem Sohn…
\nDen alten Mann, ein Jude in der Synagoge…
\n— Den Rabbi auf der Stra\u00dfe —
\nMein Aufenthalt in Jerusalem WERDE ich niemals<\/strong> vergessen.<\/p>\n

Cui bono???<\/strong>
\nForsche nach der Quelle…
\nJa, ja z. Bsp. das GELD…
\nUnd du WIRST zum Verschw\u00f6rungstheoretiker erkl\u00e4rt…
\n\ud83d\ude42
\nNa ja, manchmal sage sie auch du w\u00e4rst ein „Drogens\u00fcchtiger“
\n\ud83d\ude09
\nDie Ger\u00fcche mischen sich UND dennoch sind sie eindeutig…
\nEin Stall ist meist unverwechselbar.<\/p>\n

\"\"
\n…
\n…
\n…<\/p>\n

„POLITICS
\nJULY 17, 2013
\nCIA Backs $630,000 Scientific Study on Controlling Global Climate
\nConspiracy theorists, rejoice!<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

CIA logo: Wikimedia<\/a>; Background:Wikimedia<\/a><\/p>\n

The Central Intelligence Agency is funding a scientific study that will investigate whether humans could use geoengineering to alter Earth\u2019s environment and stop climate change. The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) will run the 21-month project, which is the first NAS geoengineering study financially supported by an intelligence agency. With the spooks\u2019 money, scientists will study how humans might influence weather patterns, assess the potential dangers of messing with the climate, and investigate possible national security implications of geoengineering attempts.<\/p>\n

The total cost of the project is $630,000, which NAS is splitting with the CIA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and NASA. The NAS website says that \u201cthe US intelligence community\u201d is funding the project, and William Kearney, a spokesman for NAS, told Mother Jones that phrase refers to the CIA. Edward Price, a spokesman for the CIA, refused to confirm the agency\u2019s role in the study, but said, \u201cIt\u2019s natural that on a subject like climate change the Agency would work with scientists to better understand the phenomenon and its implications on national security.\u201d The CIA reportedly closed its research center on climate change and national security last year, after GOP members of Congress argued that the CIA shouldn\u2019t be looking at climate change.<\/p>\n

The goal of the CIA-backed NAS study is to conduct a \u201ctechnical evaluation of a limited number of proposed geoengineering techniques,\u201d according to the NAS website. Scientists will attempt to determine which geoengineering techniques are feasible and try to evaluate the impacts and risks of each (including \u201cnational security concerns\u201d). One proposed geoengineering method the study will look at is solar radiation management\u2014a fancy term for pumping particles into the stratosphere to reflect incoming sunlight away from the planet. In theory, solar radiation management could lead to a global cooling trend that might reverse, or at least slow down, global warming. The study will also investigate proposals for removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.<\/p>\n

The National Academies has held two previous workshops on geoengineering, but neither was funded by the intelligence community, says Edward Dunlea, the study director for the latest project. The CIA would not say why it had decided to fund the project at this time, but the US government\u2019s apparent interest in altering the climate isn\u2019t new. The first big use of weather modification as a military tactic came during the Vietnam War, when the Air Force engaged in a cloud seeding program to try to create rainfall and turn the Ho Chi Minh Trail into muck, and thereby gain tactical advantage. Between 1962 and 1983, other would-be weather engineers tried to change the behavior of hurricanes using silver iodide. That effort, dubbed Project Stormfury, was spearheaded by the Navy and the Commerce Department. China\u2019s \u201cWeather Modification Office\u201d also controversially seeded clouds in advance of the 2008 Beijing Olympics, hoping to ensure rain would fall in the Beijing suburbs instead of over the Olympic stadiums.<\/p>\n

Although previous efforts to manipulate weather and climate have often been met with mockery, many geoengineering proposals \u201care fundamentally doable, relatively cheap, and do appear to be able to reduce climate risk significantly, but with risks,\u201d explains David Keith, a Harvard researcher and top geoengineering proponent.<\/p>\n

But if geoengineering is cheap and \u201cfundamentally doable,\u201d as Keith claims, that suggests foreign countries, or even wealthy individuals, could mess with the climate to advance their own ends. \u201cThis whole issue of lone actors: Do we need to be concerned about China acting unilaterally? Is that just idle chatter, or is that something the US government should prepare for?\u201d asks Ken Caldeira, a geoengineering researcher at the Carnegie Institution\u2019s Department of Global Ecology and a member of the current National Academy of Sciences panel.<\/p>\n

At least one individual has already tried modifying the climate. Russ George, the former head of Planktos, a company that works to develop technology to deal with global warming, seeded the Pacific Ocean off western Canada with iron to generate a plankton bloom that, in turn, was supposed to suck up carbon dioxide from the air. George\u2019s effort was widely condemned, but at present there\u2019s little to stop other individuals or countries from trying it or something similar. That\u2019s part of what has the US intelligence community interested.<\/p>\n

The CIA\u2019s decision to fund scientific work on geoengineering will no doubt excite conspiracy theorists. The last time the government tried to do cutting-edge research related to the atmosphere\u2014with the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP), which aimed to protect satellites from nuclear blasts\u2014people speculated that it might be a death ray, a mind control weapon, or, worst of all\u2026a way to control the weather.“<\/p>\n

CIA Backs $630,000 Scientific Study on Controlling Global Climate<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n